🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart nuclear discussions with Washington as long as it is handled with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations was effective, and shared fresh requests had come from mediators to reopen talks with the US government. He asserted Iran had zero unreported enrichment locations, and Iran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Path

The foreign minister is walking a challenging path since Iran aims to avoid be seen to be acting from a position of vulnerability, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had emerged more resilient militarily and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a defense forum in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium within its borders that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the stalemate in the prior discussions.

Earlier Negotiations Abruptly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with Washington's assistance, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a fortnight-long engagement that culminated with the US president claiming the locations had been eliminated. Following this, EU nations exercised their privilege to restore global restrictions, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Magic Solution Suggested

Iran's diplomats said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in previous talks, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to declare success since local refinement would have persisted and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the talks that Washington's technical specialists could function within Iranian territory, but that was a reasonable assumption of the cooperative offer. Officials claimed repeatedly they had secured an understanding with the US representative the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "opponents in the US".

Current Situation

Iran's diplomats stated the partnership proposal was now no longer available, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be revived in some form if talks resume.

Trump recently claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but privately Tehran representatives state they are not yet obtaining clear proposals from America either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, Egypt, Oman and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says negotiations is not part of a spectacle.

Political Position

In his remarks to the gathering, designed to depict the US as a dominant force that exploits the idea of global regulations, the foreign minister said the two-week conflict demonstrated the dispute could not be settled by armed force. He stated the attacks commenced with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and ended with an unconditional call for a ceasefire.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were mounted with total Washington understanding and cooperation, making faith hard to restore.

Dialogue Stays the Ultimate Solution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to impose their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be active and stays the primary solution to settle conflicts, but its criteria, regulations and fundamentals must be followed."

"Provided that they address to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and respect, they will receive a answer in the equivalent tone."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is characterized by Tehran representatives as the conflict of repair and rebuilding, the foreign minister stated he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been reestablished. We gained many lessons from this engagement; we have identified our internal vulnerabilities and the shortcomings of the enemy."

He stated: "We managed to survive this war. Our enrichment knowledge, which they aimed to eliminate, remains in place. The installations and equipment, if damaged, will be rebuilt; what is important is the will of the citizens of Tehran and then the social solidarity that they sought to undermine, but were unable to shatter. The citizens of Tehran have become more resilient, more cohesive, and more backing of the administration and the nation in the face of this attack."