🔗 Share this article

Do your LinkedIn connections recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of women participated in a collective LinkedIn experiment recently after popular discussions suggested that changing their gender to "male" enhanced their network presence.

Some participants modified their profiles to include what they called "bro-coded" language - adding action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "transform" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who employ online business jargon.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to determine which posts are shown to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but claimed it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not affect how your posts appears in search or feed.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who modified her gender identifiers to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The numbers I'm observing show a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "male"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she recycled previous content with comparable "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a 415% increase in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she stated. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male swaggering around."

She discontinued the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results got better, I became more frustrated."

Mixed Results

Some participants encountered favorable results. Cass Cooper who changed both her profile gender to "male" and her race to "white" reported a reduction in visibility and interaction.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it operates in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she commented.

Broader Implications

These tests coincide with ongoing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and social space.

Recent changes in the past few months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where identical posts by men and women received vastly different reach.

System Details

According to LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to categorize and spread content based on multiple factors, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative proposed that current reductions in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."