🔗 Share this article

When I am a DM, I usually steered clear of extensive use of luck during my tabletop roleplaying sessions. I preferred was for the plot and what happened in a game to be guided by character actions instead of random chance. That said, I chose to try something different, and I'm truly happy with the result.

The Catalyst: Observing an Improvised Tool

A well-known podcast utilizes a DM who frequently requests "luck rolls" from the players. He does this by choosing a polyhedral and assigning potential outcomes based on the roll. While it's at its core no distinct from using a random table, these are created in the moment when a course of events doesn't have a predetermined conclusion.

I decided to try this approach at my own session, mostly because it appeared interesting and offered a change from my usual habits. The experience were fantastic, prompting me to think deeply about the often-debated balance between preparation and randomization in a roleplaying game.

An Emotional Session Moment

During one session, my party had concluded a city-wide fight. When the dust settled, a player wondered if two friendly NPCs—a pair—had lived. In place of deciding myself, I handed it over to chance. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. The stakes were: on a 1-4, both would perish; a middling roll, only one would die; on a 10+, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This triggered a incredibly emotional sequence where the party came upon the bodies of their allies, forever holding hands in death. The group performed funeral rites, which was particularly powerful due to earlier character interactions. In a concluding touch, I decided that the forms were strangely restored, revealing a spell-storing object. I randomized, the bead's magical effect was precisely what the party required to address another critical story problem. You simply script such perfect moments.

Honing DM Agility

This incident caused me to question if improvisation and making it up are in fact the beating heart of D&D. Even if you are a detail-oriented DM, your ability to adapt may atrophy. Groups frequently excel at upending the most detailed plots. Therefore, a effective DM has to be able to think quickly and invent content in real-time.

Employing luck rolls is a fantastic way to practice these talents without straying too much outside your preparation. The strategy is to apply them for low-stakes circumstances that won't drastically alter the campaign's main plot. For instance, I wouldn't use it to establish if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. However, I would consider using it to determine if the party enter a room right after a critical event occurs.

Strengthening Collaborative Storytelling

Luck rolls also helps keep players engaged and cultivate the impression that the game world is alive, evolving in reaction to their actions as they play. It combats the perception that they are merely actors in a rigidly planned narrative, thereby strengthening the collaborative foundation of roleplaying.

This approach has long been embedded in the core of D&D. Early editions were filled with charts, which made sense for a game focused on treasure hunting. While modern D&D often prioritizes narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they require detailed plans, this isn't always the required method.

Achieving the Right Balance

It is perfectly no problem with thorough preparation. But, equally valid no issue with relinquishing control and permitting the rolls to determine certain outcomes in place of you. Authority is a significant factor in a DM's job. We require it to run the game, yet we can be reluctant to release it, in situations where doing so can lead to great moments.

A piece of suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of temporarily losing control. Try a little improvisation for smaller story elements. You might just discover that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more memorable than anything you could have pre-written on your own.